You are here

» The effects of facial maturity and crime-type on determinations of culpability and sentence length

The effects of facial maturity and crime-type on determinations of culpability and sentence length

Description
Creator: 

Poitras, Jonathan

Responsibility: 
Jonathon Poitras
Start Date: 
2007
End Date: 
2007
Date Range: 
2007 April 02
Physical Description: 

1.07 MB of textual records (PDF)

Notes: 

Audience: Undergraduate. -- Dissertation: Thesis (B. A.). -- Algoma University, 2007. -- Submitted in partial fulfillment of course requirements for PSYC 4105. -- Includes tables and questionnaires. -- Contents: Literature review / Thesis.

Bibliographic Information
Publication: 
Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.:
Standard No: 
OSTMA-PSYC-Poitras-Jonathan-20070402
Physical Location
rec_shelfloc: 
2013-064-001
Repository: 
Algoma University Archive
Container Number: 
001
Conservation
Historical Context: 

Perceived culpability and sentencing of a defendant is affected by several variables, including the defendant's appearance, and whether the juror is the same or opposite gender. For example, generally attractive defendants are shown leniency but not by same sex jurors, or if they appear to have used their appearance to aid in the commission of an offense. Another example is facial maturity, baby-faced people are shown more leniency for crimes that are perceived as intentional, whereas mature-faced people are shown more leniency for crimes that are perceived as negligent. The purpose of this study was determine whether different levels of facial maturity of a male defendant affect culpability and the sentence length imposed by a juror, and if so, whether this effect is affected by a defendant exploiting his appearance to aid in the commission of the crime, or the gender of the juror.

Description Level: